Mass attracting mass has been “debunked” by mainstream physics for over a century, it’s crazy how prevalent this talking point still is.
“Proponents argue that gravity acts as the “force” keeping gases from diffusing”
Yet therein lies the rub: gravity hasn’t been a force since general relativity rebranded it as the curvature of spacetime. Under GR, gravity doesn’t pull — it bends.
Rocket ignition in a vacuum—cannot be possible, never has been done under laboratory experiments.
Also, propulsion in a vacuum—cannot occur! “Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of physics knows that rockets require a fulcrum to push against a move.” —E. Hendrie “The Greateat Lie on Earth”.
A rocket in the vacuum of “space” would be useless and has never been observed in a laboratory or otherwise.
Top that with the fact that entropic law (the second law of thermodynamics) is violated by the very IDEA of an outer space vacuum described as a 10^-17 Torr “near perfect vacuum”. IF the sky were a vacuum, all the gasses on earth would disperse into the vacuum instantly. IOW: we’d all be dead.
The ‘concept’ of a sky vacuum is a begging the question fallacy, which should stop the conversation immediately, as “space” FIRST needs to be defined and an actually observed phenomena in order to continue the conversation. SPACE needs to be proven to exist, before one posits what happens in and around it. The rest of the apologetics for why we DON’T observe the things we should IF space and gravity was real, are an exercise in religious dogma and belief.
Help me understand how to make this idea resonate with a person who accepts space as reality because that’s what they’ve been taught their entire life and they believe all the NASA footage as evidence space is real.
The best way I know to start and sometimes end the conversation at the same time is to simply ask, “Is it possible to create gas pressure or a vacuum without a container?”
Or maybe: “Have you ever observed a vacuum in nature, that wasn’t man made?”
Sometimes the penny drops, and most of the time it doesn’t.
Mass attracting mass has been “debunked” by mainstream physics for over a century, it’s crazy how prevalent this talking point still is.
“Proponents argue that gravity acts as the “force” keeping gases from diffusing”
Yet therein lies the rub: gravity hasn’t been a force since general relativity rebranded it as the curvature of spacetime. Under GR, gravity doesn’t pull — it bends.
The artificial intelligence is getting smarter as it learns, and the more you push it, the more it eventually tells the truth.
Next topic of refute:
Rocket ignition in a vacuum—cannot be possible, never has been done under laboratory experiments.
Also, propulsion in a vacuum—cannot occur! “Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of physics knows that rockets require a fulcrum to push against a move.” —E. Hendrie “The Greateat Lie on Earth”.
A rocket in the vacuum of “space” would be useless and has never been observed in a laboratory or otherwise.
Top that with the fact that entropic law (the second law of thermodynamics) is violated by the very IDEA of an outer space vacuum described as a 10^-17 Torr “near perfect vacuum”. IF the sky were a vacuum, all the gasses on earth would disperse into the vacuum instantly. IOW: we’d all be dead.
The ‘concept’ of a sky vacuum is a begging the question fallacy, which should stop the conversation immediately, as “space” FIRST needs to be defined and an actually observed phenomena in order to continue the conversation. SPACE needs to be proven to exist, before one posits what happens in and around it. The rest of the apologetics for why we DON’T observe the things we should IF space and gravity was real, are an exercise in religious dogma and belief.
Help me understand how to make this idea resonate with a person who accepts space as reality because that’s what they’ve been taught their entire life and they believe all the NASA footage as evidence space is real.
The best way I know to start and sometimes end the conversation at the same time is to simply ask, “Is it possible to create gas pressure or a vacuum without a container?”
Or maybe: “Have you ever observed a vacuum in nature, that wasn’t man made?”
Sometimes the penny drops, and most of the time it doesn’t.